AI governance

Say yes to AI, with the guardrails to prove it.

Register every AI model and use case, sort each one into a risk tier, approve it through the right workflow, and keep watching it after it goes live, with conditions, monitoring and re-reviews on schedule.

AI use case register with use cases in use, awaiting review, high risk, reviews due and overdue conditions

Generative AI assistants

Ambient documentation

Clinical decision support

Revenue cycle automation

Chatbots

AI in vendor products

Models you build

AI in every step

Governance that keeps pace with AI.

Automatic risk tiering

Rules read the facts of each use case (the data it touches, who it affects, the decisions it makes) and set its risk tier, which picks the review it needs.

Conditions that fit the use case

A library of obligations marks the conditions of approval that apply, from human review of outputs to disclosure and bias testing.

Monitoring after go-live

Track accuracy, drift, override rates, hallucination findings and subgroup disparity against limits. A breach flags the use case for review.

AI safety events as cases

When an AI system misbehaves, staff report it like any other incident, and it is investigated and linked back to the use case.

AI use case risk tier worked out from the rules it matched and the facts behind them

Register

One register for every model and use case.

See what AI is in use, where, on what data, and who is accountable for it.

Use cases numbered and linked to the models, applications and data they use

Models with the scope they are approved for

An AI profile on each application record

A request form anyone in the organization can use

AI model register with provider, kind, deployment, status, BAA and FDA status
AI risk rules that set the risk tier for each use case

Risk tiers

Risk tiers that set the level of review.

Not every use case needs a committee. Tiers send each one to the review it deserves.

Tiers and rules your team can edit, with sensible defaults

Rules based on data, population, decision role and more

The tier picks the approval workflow

The tier sets how often the use case is reviewed again

Approval

Approval workflows with conditions attached.

Reviewers, checklists and approvers in stages, with the conditions of approval tracked afterward.

Starter workflows that install in a click

Reviewers, requirements and approvers at each stage

One-off and recurring conditions of approval

A material change to an approved use case triggers a change review

Conditions of approval for an AI use case with owners, due dates and status
AI monitoring metrics for accuracy, drift and subgroup disparity with latest readings

Monitoring

Keep watching after go-live.

Approval is the start, not the end. Re-reviews and monitoring run on their own.

Metrics on each use case or model, with limits and a baseline

Readings outside the limits flag the use case for review

Scheduled re-reviews start automatically

Overdue reviews and breaches on the dashboard

Frameworks

Aligned with the frameworks regulators cite.

Show how your AI program maps to the standards your board and regulators ask about.

NIST AI RMF as a compliance program on the shared control library

AI use cases and models linked to risks in the register

Third-party AI tracked with the vendor that provides it

Evidence ready for auditors, regulators and the board

AI use case record describing what it does, who it affects, its models and applications

See how Simpliance governs AI.

We’ll register one of your AI use cases, tier it, route it for approval and set up monitoring, live, in 30 minutes.